Criteria for Evaluating and Prioritizing Horizon Europe Proposals
Evaluation and Prioritization Criteria for Horizon Europe Proposals The evaluation of proposals submitted under the Horizon Europe framework, which includes initiatives such as the EIC Accelerator and EIC Pathfinder, is a structured process designed to identify, prioritize, and fund projects that have the potential to drive significant innovation and societal impact across Europe. This article delves into the essential evaluation and prioritization criteria that the European Innovation Council (EIC) employs to assess applications effectively. 1. Prioritization Based on Scores One of the core aspects of the evaluation process is the scoring system. Proposals that score equally will be prioritized based on their ‘Impact’ scores. For ‘Innovation actions’, the focus is similarly placed on ‘Impact’ first, followed by ‘Excellence’. This scoring method is crucial as it encourages applicants to align their projects with the broader objectives of Horizon Europe, particularly in driving innovation that can lead to economic growth and societal benefits. 2. Gender Balance Consideration The evaluation process recognizes the importance of diversity within research teams. Consequently, if necessary, the gender balance among the researchers listed in the proposal’s researcher table may factor into evaluation outcomes, serving as an additional criterion for prioritization. This approach underlines the EIC’s commitment to promoting inclusivity and equality within the innovation landscape. 3. Geographical Diversity Geographical diversity is another vital criterion in the prioritization process. If additional prioritization is required, the number of Member States or Associated Countries represented in the proposal will be assessed. Proposals that include partners from countries not already benefiting from higher-ranked projects will receive preference. In the event of equal representation, the budget may serve as a tiebreaker, ensuring that funding is distributed in a way that promotes broad regional collaboration and innovation. 4. Further Prioritization Factors When proposals cannot be distinguished through the previous criteria, the evaluation panel might consider other elements that are relevant to the objectives of the call or the overarching goals of Horizon Europe. This can include enhancing the quality of the project portfolio through synergies among projects or, when applicable, the inclusion of Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). Such considerations are documented in the panel report and highlight the EIC’s commitment to fostering a collaborative ecosystem for innovation. 5. Final Evaluation Process The methods outlined in points 1 through 4 are systematically applied to any remaining proposals that are ranked equally within a group. This structured approach ensures fairness and transparency in the evaluation process, which is critical for maintaining trust among applicants and stakeholders. 6. Communication of Results Upon concluding the evaluation process, all applicants receive detailed feedback regarding the outcomes through an evaluation result letter. Successful proposals will move to the next phase, known as ‘grant preparation’, where they will further develop their project plans. Conversely, other proposals may find themselves on a reserve list or rejected, providing clear communication about their standing in the process. 7. Funding Commitment Disclaimer It’s important for applicants to understand that an invitation to the grant preparation stage does not equate to a formal commitment to funding. Several legal checks still need to be completed before a grant can be awarded, including legal entity validation, financial capacity verification, and exclusion checks. These steps ensure that the funds are distributed responsibly and equitably, aligning with the goals of EIC funding. 8. Additional Recognitions Proposals may also qualify for prestigious recognitions such as the Seal of Excellence or the Sovereignty (STEP) Seal. These accolades not only enhance project credibility but also potentially open doors to additional financing opportunities and collaborations. With the applicant’s consent, the EIC can share information about the proposal and its evaluation with interested financing authorities, provided confidentiality agreements are established. Moreover, project details for those receiving the STEP Seal may be showcased in the STEP Portal to improve visibility and attract potential investors, greatly benefiting startups seeking funding. 9. Budget Flexibility The budgets outlined in the calls and topics are indicative and may undergo changes following the evaluation process unless specified otherwise. This flexibility allows the EIC to allocate funds efficiently and adjust funding amounts to match project needs better. Applicants should be prepared for the possibility that final figures may differ from those initially proposed, which underscores the importance of meticulous budget planning during the EIC Accelerator application process. 10. The Role of EIC in European Innovation The European Innovation Council, particularly through its EIC Accelerator and EIC Transition funding, plays a pivotal role in supporting deep tech startups and scaling innovative solutions across Europe. The EIC Accelerator provides non-dilutive funding opportunities that are particularly attractive for startups aiming to maintain equity while securing essential resources for their growth. Understanding the distinction between grants and equity—as well as knowing how to apply for EIC Accelerator funding—is crucial for startups eager to tap into these resources effectively. 11. Best Practices for EIC Accelerator Applications To enhance the success rate of proposals under the EIC Accelerator, applicants are encouraged to adopt best practices and strategies for effective proposal writing. This includes detailed project planning, establishing a clear value proposition, and demonstrating the project’s potential impact on the European market. Engaging with EIC Accelerator coaching services can also provide valuable insights and support in preparing competitive applications. Knowing the EIC Accelerator application deadline for 2025 is essential for timely submissions, ensuring that startups don’t miss out on these significant funding opportunities. 12. Conclusion The prioritization and evaluation process for Horizon Europe proposals is complex, yet crucial for fostering innovation across Europe. By aligning projects with the objectives of the EIC and adhering to the established criteria, applicants can enhance their chances of securing funding. With various opportunities available, including the EIC Pathfinder and EIC Transition, startups have numerous avenues to explore within the umbrella of European Union innovation funding. By adhering to best practices and leveraging support from EIC programs, ambitious projects can thrive, ultimately benefiting society and driving economic growth.